|
|
|
B-07/01
February 22, 2001
Repeal of Federal Estate Tax Would Have Effect on States
|
Repeal of the federal estate tax will effectively repeal the state estate tax in 40 states and the District of Columbia and have a fiscal and tax policy impact on the others because it would do away with the state death tax credit -- a feature of the federal estate tax with which all states have, to varying degrees, coordinated their death (inheritance or estate) taxes. Repeal of the federal estate tax, presuming no countervailing state legislative action, will reduce state tax receipts by several billions of dollars annually. |
President Bush's tax reduction proposals call for elimination of the federal estate and gift tax by 2009. A similar measure was passed by the Congress in 2000, but vetoed by President Clinton. Repeal of the federal estate tax will effectively repeal the state estate tax in 40 states and the District of Columbia1 and have a fiscal and tax policy impact on the others because it would do away with the state death tax credit -- a feature of the federal estate tax with which all states have, to varying degrees, coordinated their death (inheritance or estate) taxes. Repeal of the federal estate tax, presuming no countervailing state legislative action, will reduce state tax receipts by several billions of dollars annually.
Mechanics
The Internal Revenue Code (IRC § 2011) allows a credit
against federal estate taxes (on a dollar-for-dollar basis) for state
death taxes paid. The state death tax credit is limited based on the
size of the estate and a set of graduated rates specified in federal
law.2
All states have structured their inheritance/estate taxes to be
coordinated with the federal state death tax credit. At the present
time, 38 states and the District of Columbia [Table 1]
provide that the only state death tax is a "pick-up" or "sponge" tax
in which the state death tax is an amount equal to the state death
tax credit allowed for federal purposes. In addition, Louisiana and
Connecticut have enacted laws to move to a pure pick-up tax by 2004
and 2005, respectively.
|
Alabama |
P |
Missouri |
P |
|
|
Alaska |
P |
Montana |
P [4] |
|
|
Arizona |
P |
Nebraska |
P [5] |
|
|
Arkansas |
P |
Nevada |
P |
|
|
California |
P |
New Hampshire |
I |
|
|
Colorado |
P |
New Jersey |
I |
|
|
Connecticut |
I [1] |
New Mexico |
P |
|
|
Delaware |
P |
New York |
P [6] |
|
|
District of Columbia |
P |
North Carolina |
P [7] |
|
|
Florida |
P |
North Dakota |
P |
|
|
Georgia |
P |
Ohio |
|
|
|
Hawaii |
P |
Oklahoma |
E |
|
|
Idaho |
P |
Oregon |
P |
|
|
Illinois |
P |
Pennsylvania |
I |
|
|
Indiana |
I |
Rhode Island |
P |
|
|
Iowa |
I |
South Carolina |
P |
|
|
Kansas |
|
South Dakota |
P [8] |
|
|
Kentucky |
I |
Tennessee |
I |
|
|
Louisiana |
|
Texas |
P |
|
|
Maine |
P |
Utah |
P |
|
|
Maryland |
I |
Vermont |
P |
|
|
Massachusetts |
P |
Virginia |
P |
|
|
Michigan |
P |
Washington |
P |
|
|
Minnesota |
P |
West Virginia |
P |
|
|
Mississippi |
P [3] |
Wisconsin |
P |
|
|
Wyoming |
P |
P = Pick-up tax only; I = Separate state
inheritance tax; E = Separate state estate tax.
Connecticut is phasing out its inheritance tax; under current law,
the state will move to a pick-up only tax in 2005.
Louisiana is phasing out its inheritance tax; under current law, the
state will move to a pick-up only tax in 2004.
Mississippi phased out its separate estate tax. After January 1,
2000, only the pick-up tax applies.
Montana voters approved an initiative repealing the state's
inheritance tax effective December 31, 2000; only the pick-up tax now
applies.
Nebraska employs a pick-up tax at the state level. Counties impose
and collect a separate inheritance tax.
New York repealed its separate estate tax effective February 1, 2000;
the state now has a pick-up tax based on the state death tax credit
schedule in effect on that date.
North Carolina moved from an inheritance tax to a pick-up only tax
effective January 1, 1999.
South Dakota voters approved repeal of the state's inheritance tax
effective June 30, 2001; at that point, the state will move to a
pick-up only tax.
Source: Commerce Clearing House, 2001 State Tax
Handbook and discussions with state tax administrators.
A pick-up tax works as if the state had enacted an estate tax with
rates (and base) equal to the credit schedule specified in federal
law. Under a pick-up tax there is no additional net burden to the
taxpayer from the state tax; in its absence, additional tax in the
same amount would be paid to the federal treasury. Repeal of the
federal estate tax will have the effect of repealing the state death
tax in those jurisdictions that rely only on a pick-up or sponge
tax.3
The remaining states employ a separate estate tax or a separate inheritance tax, although in most cases the definition of many items in the tax conforms closely to the federal estate tax.4 In each of these states, the state death tax also provides that in cases where the amount allowed under the federal death tax credit is greater than the liability computed under the separate state inheritance/estate tax, the liability of the taxpayer is the amount of the death tax credit.
The state death tax credit has been a permanent feature of the
federal estate tax since 1926. At that time, the federal government
was looking to reduce estate tax rates (increased temporarily during
World War I) or to repeal the tax and leave it to the states that had
traditionally made greater use of the tax than the federal
government. At the same time, state leaders were seeking mechanisms
to reduce what was becoming an intense competition for wealthy
residents. In the years preceding 1926, some states had repealed
their death taxes, and two had adopted constitutional amendments
prohibiting such levies in an effort to attract wealthy retirees as
residents. Enactment of the state death tax credit in 1926 served
both purposes. It reduced the federal tax and reduced interstate
competition by putting a floor on the level of combined state-federal
death taxes.5
Fiscal Impact
In FY 1999, total state revenues from all types of death taxes
amounted to about $7.5 billion,6 or 1.5
percent of all state tax collections as shown in Table 2.7
Death taxes ranged from somewhat over 4.5 percent of total state tax
receipts in New Hampshire to less than 0.2 percent of all taxes in
Alaska.
In the 35 jurisdictions employing only a pick-up tax in 1999,
death tax revenues amounted to $3.95 billion or 1.2 percent of state
tax revenues in FY 1999. In states employing a separate inheritance
or estate tax, death tax revenues accounted for $3.6 billion or 2.1
percent of tax revenues in those states.
Projecting the fiscal impact of the federal estate tax repeal in 2009
is difficult. Such a projection would rely on changes in the value of
estates subject to tax as well as the projected impact in those
states having a separate state tax operating along side the state
death tax credit. The Center on Budget and Policy Priorities, a
Washington-based research and advocacy group, has estimated that
federal repeal in 2009 would reduce state revenues by upwards of $9.0
billion annually by that time.8 That
would seem to be a reasonable figure given the large majority of
states that rely only on a pick-up tax and projected increases in
federal estate tax receipts. Federal estate tax receipts were $29.0
billion in FY 2000, and the Joint Committee on Taxation expects cost
of the fully phased-in estate tax repeal to exceed $50 billion per
year in 2009.
At a minimum, it can be said that if the federal tax had been
repealed in 1999, state revenues would have been reduced by just
under $4 billion, not an insignificant amount. In 2000, the impact of
all state legislative tax changes was projected to reduce state
receipts by about the same amount.
Other Issues
Repeal of the federal estate tax raises additional issues. First,
those states that employ a separate state estate or inheritance tax
generally follow federal rules regarding the treatment of certain
types of property or transactions in computing estate values or
bequeathed amounts. This is generally done in the interests of
taxpayers as well as compliance and trying to establish a single set
of estate planning rules for taxpayers. In the absence of a federal
estate tax, these rules are likely to be 'frozen in time' and
eventually diverge from state-to-state. There are some who question
the ability of states to maintain a separate tax in the absence of a
federal levy.
Second, repeal of the estate tax may well have implications for
other taxes as it changes expected taxpayer behavior. The lack of an
estate tax may well have an effect on transfers of property among
individuals, charitable donations and capital gains realizations
&endash; each of which may affect other taxes. The difficulty will be
in attempting to sort out the issues so that accurate projections of
the other taxes can be made.
In addition, there has been some speculation that the absence of a
federal estate and gift tax would provide planning opportunities in
which wealthy individuals could take advantage of state tax
differences to avoid state tax on certain types of income. The New
York Times in a front-page piece [01/29/2001] suggested that
repeal of the federal estate and gift tax would enable some
individuals to establish trusts in non-income tax states, avoid tax
on the income to the trust and recover the capital of the trust
without an income tax at a later point, even though the individual
was a resident of an income tax state. The article also identified
that repeal of the federal tax would allow a gifting of appreciated
stock to individuals with a low income or negative income, thus
allowing a realization of the gain with minimal tax
consequences.
FY 1999
|
Death Tax |
Per Capita |
Percent |
Type of |
|
|
|
Revs. ($000) |
Revenues |
of Total |
Tax |
|
Alaska |
$ 1,726 |
$ 2.79 |
0.2% |
P |
|
Alabama |
$ 62,784 |
$ 14.37 |
1.0% |
P |
|
Arkansas |
$ 32,572 |
$ 12.77 |
0.7% |
P |
|
Arizona |
$ 89,088 |
$ 18.64 |
1.2% |
P |
|
California |
$ 877,901 |
$ 26.49 |
1.2% |
P |
|
Colorado |
$ 65,391 |
$ 16.12 |
1.1% |
P |
|
Connecticut |
$ 250,171 |
$ 76.22 |
2.6% |
I* |
|
District of Columbia |
$ 26,200 |
$ 50.48 |
0.9% |
P |
|
Delaware |
$ 27,058 |
$ 35.91 |
1.3% |
P |
|
Florida |
$ 649,521 |
$ 42.98 |
2.7% |
P |
|
Georgia |
$ 111,192 |
$ 14.28 |
0.9% |
P |
|
Hawaii |
$ 28,738 |
$ 24.24 |
0.9% |
P |
|
Iowa |
$ 72,836 |
$ 25.38 |
1.5% |
I |
|
Idaho |
$ 11,128 |
$ 8.89 |
0.5% |
P |
|
Illinois |
$ 346,978 |
$ 28.61 |
1.6% |
P |
|
Indiana |
$ 148,712 |
$ 25.02 |
1.5% |
I |
|
Kansas |
$ 70,239 |
$ 26.46 |
1.5% |
P |
|
Kentucky |
$ 81,483 |
$ 20.57 |
1.1% |
I |
|
Louisiana |
$ 95,973 |
$ 21.95 |
1.6% |
I* |
|
Massachusetts |
$ 173,867 |
$ 28.16 |
1.2% |
P |
|
Maryland |
$ 126,168 |
$ 24.40 |
1.3% |
I |
|
Maine |
$ 29,768 |
$ 23.76 |
1.2% |
P |
|
Michigan |
$ 174,891 |
$ 17.73 |
0.7% |
P |
|
Minnesota |
$ 58,132 |
$ 12.17 |
0.5% |
P |
|
Missouri |
$ 118,670 |
$ 21.70 |
1.4% |
P |
|
Mississippi |
$ 30,767 |
$ 11.11 |
0.7% |
P* |
|
Montana |
$ 18,302 |
$ 20.73 |
1.3% |
P* |
|
North Carolina |
$ 182,851 |
$ 23.90 |
1.3% |
P* |
|
North Dakota |
$ 7,416 |
$ 11.70 |
0.7% |
P |
|
Nebraska |
$ 17,449 |
$ 10.47 |
0.7% |
P* |
|
New Hampshire |
$ 49,368 |
$ 41.10 |
4.6% |
I |
|
New Jersey |
$ 423,015 |
$ 51.95 |
2.5% |
I |
|
New Mexico |
$ 21,912 |
$ 12.59 |
0.6% |
P |
|
Nevada |
$ 41,472 |
$ 22.92 |
1.2% |
P |
|
New York |
$ 1,071,464 |
$ 58.88 |
2.8% |
P* |
|
Ohio |
$ 141,456 |
$ 12.57 |
0.8% |
E |
|
Oklahoma |
$ 88,796 |
$ 26.44 |
1.6% |
E |
|
Oregon |
$ 47,979 |
$ 14.47 |
0.9% |
P |
|
Pennsylvania |
$ 760,698 |
$ 63.42 |
3.5% |
I |
|
Rhode Island |
$ 46,854 |
$ 47.29 |
2.5% |
P |
|
S. Carolina |
$ 57,190 |
$ 14.72 |
1.0% |
P |
|
S. Dakota |
$ 26,427 |
$ 36.05 |
3.0% |
P* |
|
Tennessee |
$ 89,127 |
$ 16.25 |
1.2% |
I |
|
Texas |
$ 256,277 |
$ 12.79 |
1.0% |
P |
|
Utah |
$ 8,238 |
$ 3.87 |
0.2% |
P |
|
Virginia |
$ 154,078 |
$ 22.42 |
1.3% |
P |
|
Vermont |
$ 23,358 |
$ 39.34 |
2.3% |
P |
|
Washington |
$ 69,701 |
$ 12.11 |
0.6% |
P |
|
Wisconsin |
$ 116,898 |
$ 22.26 |
1.0% |
P |
|
West Virginia |
$ 27,325 |
$ 15.12 |
0.9% |
P |
|
Wyoming |
$ 9,731 |
$ 20.29 |
1.2% |
P |
|
U.S. Total |
$ 7,519,336 |
1.5% |
||
1 This count includes Louisiana and Connecticut, each of which under current state law, will have moved to a "pick-up tax" only by the time the repeal is effective. Throughout the report, D.C. is considered a state.
2 The maximum allowable credit ranges from 0.8 percent for estates with an adjusted taxable value of $40,000-$90,000 to 16 percent for estates with an adjusted taxable value in excess of $10,040,000.
3 This is not automatically the case in New York and Washingon where the state pick-up tax is based on the federal estate tax as it existed on a certain date. Repeal of the federal estate tax would leave the state with an estate tax equal to the current state death tax credit schedule. Absent any state legislative action, this would constitute a separate estate tax filing in New York.
4 In Nebraska, the state imposes a pick-up tax; counties impose and administer a separate inheritance tax. There is no credit for the local inheritance tax; that credit is absorbed by the state pick-up tax.
5 Advisory Commission on Intergovernmental Relations, "Coordination of State and Federal Inheritance, Estate and Gift Taxes," Washington, D.C., January 1961.
6 These revenue figures also include modest amounts of "gift tax" revenues in the 4 states levying such a tax. The President's proposal would also repeal the federal gift tax since the primary purpose of the tax is to prevent the use of gifts prior to death as a means of avoiding the estate tax. This review presumes states would also terminate their gift taxes.
7 By comparison, federal estate taxes amounted to $27.8 billion in FY 1999 or 2.3 percent of federal revenues other than Social Security and Medicare taxes.
8 Elizabeth C. McNichol, Iris J. Lav, and Daniel Tenny, "Repeal of the Federal Estate Tax Would Cost State Governments Billions in Revenue," Center on Budget and Policy Priorities, Revised December 12, 2000.